by holyjoe » Saturday 7 August 2010 4:59:29AM
Just my opinion, but I think that it would in fact be imprudent to do that. How can we know that they actually forgot? We can't read minds, and attempting to do so is never a good idea. For all we know, the person is NOT required to abstain, for example if they have permission from their pastor, or if their doctor told them to eat meat, or whatever. Assuming that everybody else has the same moral requirements as ourselves is contrary to experience and reason.
Furthermore, such an "intervention" would more often than not do more harm than good, convincing people that we have a "holier than thou" attitude, without actually convincing them to do what's right.
None of the above applies if the person actively demonstrates an openness to being corrected, such as if they ask, "Do you mind if I eat meat today, even though I know I shouldn't?" A prudent reply would be, "In that case, let's have fish today."
Just my opinion.
God bless!
-Fr Joe-
